← Blog13 May 20266 min readHiring

Hire a remote studio instead of a $200/hr US dev.

A $200/hr senior US developer bills $8,000–$12,000 across 6 weeks for a landing page. A remote studio ships the same scope for $260 in 10 days. Here's the trade-off, honestly.

The $200/hr senior US developer is a fair price for the US labour market. It's also the wrong choice for 90% of founder web work. Here's why — and when the trade actually does favour the expensive option.

What you get from the $200/hr developer

Worth the rate if you're hiring for a long-term engineering function. Not worth it if you're hiring to ship one landing page.

What you get from a remote 10-day studio

Honest math: $200/hr × 40 hours = $8,000 for one landing page. Remote studio flat fee: $260. Same Lighthouse scores. 4x faster ship. The savings are real, not a corner-cut.

When the $200/hr dev still wins

The split-the-stack play

Most founders we work with end up with both. A remote studio ships the marketing site, landing pages, and MVP fast. A US senior advises on architecture and gets pulled in for high-stakes engineering as the product scales. The split is cheaper, faster, and better than choosing one.

If your scope is a defined deliverable — landing page, marketing site, MVP — send it to us. The remote 10-day model is built for exactly this.

Common questions

Why $200/hr US dev?

Fair for US labour market. Wrong for one-off deliverables.

Remote studio as good?

Yes for 90% of founder web work. Judged by live URL.

Communication?

Async beats waiting for a Zoom slot.

When still hire $200/hr?

Fractional CTO, regulated IP, embedded relationship.

Get the same site, 4x cheaper.

10-day delivery. Flat fee. Send your scope.

Tell us your idea →